Refer to Bates College, most journal-style scientific papers are subdivided into the following sections: Title, Authors and Affiliation, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgments (Optional), and Literature Cited. So, let's start comparing these anatomies to the journal I got.
1. Firstly is the Tittle section, we can see that the journal has tittle.
2. The second is Authority section, it also puts the author of the journal.
3. The third is Abstrack section, and again it completes the third requirement
4. Fourth is Introduction section, it has introduction as well
5. The fifth requirement is Method section, and this journal puts it on.
6. Sixth is Result section, and this journal has it.
7. Next is Discussion section, but unfortunately this journal didn't mention this section.
8. The last is Literature Cited. And this journal completes the last requirement
Thus, after we compared this journal anatomies to the structure requirement of a good journal, we can stack up that this journal is not complete because it was not fulfill the requirement which is it didn't mention the Discussion section.
Introduction
This journal delivers the scrutiny of the iPad as bridge tool as used by the learners and the
teachers by way of the learners-iPad-teacher interplay (mediation) and point of result on the sustain
of the iPad for speaking skills. The aim of this research is to contribute to the body of research
inside MALL concerning the mediation value of secondary EFL learners' speaking skills development, which is below-researched. It particularly sees at what behavioral
changes happen in learners and teachers as a outcome of the iPad as a tool. In particular, this journal
investigate the following research question: How does speaking skills supported by mediating tool which is iPad.
Thank you for visiting my blog. See you to another post.
0 comments:
Post a Comment