Monday, 29 April 2019

Review Journal "Speaking Difficulties Encountered by Young EFL Learners"

Good to see you again to another post, buddies! In this post I would like to continue to do review and paraphrase of the Methodology, Findings and Implication sections. Refers Wikipedia.com, Methods (Methodology) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research on techniques in the experimental biological and medical sciences. Furthermore, Findings section is where you report the findings of your study based upon the methodology (or methodologies) you applied to gather information. It should state the findings of the research arranged in a logical sequence without bias or interpretation. Let's have a look to this journal's findings section. Moreover, More implication can be seen as additional of more speaking activity tasks on the textbook so students have wide opportunity to practice speaking. The implication can also be applied on the extracurricular activity, all cognitive level of students should be included so it will not only dominated by the good ones, as the result class will not be the only place to practice English and students will have more opportunities to speak English. Research implications basically refer to impact that your research might have on future research or policy decision or the relevant field of interest of your study. 'How will your research affect the targeted community or subject field' is the question that implications will answer. Recommendations are based on the results of your research and indicate the specific measures or directions that can be taken. For example, a clinical study might have implications for cancer research and might recommend against the use of a particular hazardous substance. Therefore, implications signify the impact of your research and recommendations might be concrete steps/actions that the research proposes.Thus, let's reveal this journal's structures!



Methodology


This study was conducted to answer the following questions, first question is what are speaking difficulties faced by grade 5 students? And the second question is what are factors that influenced to the existence of those difficulties? This study involved five teachers and students of grade 5. The instruments used in this study were lesson observation, interview and curriculum analysis. Lesson observation was conducted in the class to reveal the speaking difficulties faced by students. Four semi-structured interviews were conducted toward students and teachers of grade 5 to find their perspectives about the factors that caused those speaking difficulties. The last instrument analyzed the curriculum on the grade 5 textbook (English for Me) based on the two issues. The issues are what speaking activity the textbook contained are and what type of those activity is.

Findings

The Findings discovered that grade 5 students encountered a number of main difficulties such as linguistic difficulties, mother tongue use and inhibition. Data that are collected as the basic finding of linguistic difficulties show that student can’t find the appropriate vocabulary while speaking, due to lack of vocabulary. This is also emphasized by statement of student observed that they want to speak, but they don’t know the word. They also felt it difficult to produce for even a short sentence while they express their idea. When talking about linguistic difficulties, the use of mother tongue is strongly connected with it. When students given different task rubrics they inclined to use Arabic instead of English, this happened since they couldn’t discuss their ideas in English, lack of vocabulary and insufficient ability to produce sentence. Some studies revealed that students inhibited themselves from involving as active participant because they believe that their classmates will tease them since they make mistake in speaking English. But it didn’t occur to Omani students, they highly motivated to speak English.

The findings are also revealed about the factors which contribute on the existence of those difficulties. The first factor is teachers’ perspective and tacit beliefs about teaching English, the teachers are worried about running out of time to finish lesson steps since the time is limited by their supervisor for every lesson. The second factor is teaching strategies, teachers are more focusing on teaching grammar and vocabulary rather than speaking. It is occurs because of their perception that grammar and vocabulary mastery are felt enough to support students’ speaking ability. The third factor is curriculum, related to teachers, curriculum for grade 5 only emphasized on teaching writing and reading, also there are no particular tasks for speaking. Speaking is combined to writing and reading section implicitly. The fourth factor is curriculum analysis, in line with the teacher’ statement, the researcher analyzed the grade 5 textbook (English for Me) and only found very few speaking tasks. This means grade 5 textbook doesn’t provide sufficient opportunities for students to speak English. The last factor is extracurricular activities, since lesson duration and opportunities for children to speak English is limited, thus speaking English activity is directed to English assembly. However, students who interested to participate on this extracurricular are only the good ones, moreover the activity that only held once a week makes the use English become very limited.


Implication

The implication of this study is teachers have to be taught how to combine speaking with other teaching skills, hence speaking can be used communicatively in learning process. More implication can be seen as additional of more speaking activity tasks on the textbook so students have wide opportunity to practice speaking. The implication can also be applied on the extracurricular activity, all cognitive level of students should be included so it will not only dominated by the good ones, as the result class will not be the only place to practice English and students will have more opportunities to speak English.

Thankyou for visiting. See you to the next post 😉

Sunday, 28 April 2019

Review Journal "Speaking Difficulties Encountered by Young EFL Learners"

Good to see you again to another post, buddies! In this post we will talk about something more comprehensive and complex, that is International Journal. Well, the tittle of my Review Journal is  "Speaking Difficulties Encountered by Young EFL Learners" by Samira Al Hosni. I choosed this journal because I love everything related to technology and speaking activities. So, from this journal we will discuss about its structures and introduction section. Let's get started!

Refer to Bates College, most journal-style scientific papers are subdivided into the following sections: Title, Authors and Affiliation, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgments (Optional), and Literature Cited. So, let's start comparing these anatomies to the journal I got.

1. Firstly is the Tittle section, we can see that the journal has tittle.
2. The second is Authority section, it also puts the author of the journal.
3. The third is Abstract section, and again it completes the third requirement
4. Even though they didn't mention Literature Review as the requirement, but this journal added it and I think it is good to be added.

5. Fifth is Introduction section, it has introduction as well

6. The sixth requirement is Method section, and this journal puts it on.
7. The seventh is Result section, and this journal has it.
8. Next is Discussion section, and also this journal mentioned this section.
9. The next is conclusion, as we can see this journal has it.
10. And the last requirement is Literature Cited. And this journal completes the last requirement.

Thus, after we compared this journal anatomies to the structure requirement of a good journal, we can stack up that this journal is complete because it was fulfilling the requirements which are needed for a good journal.

And the next I would like to review the Introduction and Method section. Here we go!

Introduction
This journal restated the statement of Ministry of Education (1996) that basic education purposed to make student get the skills that is needed in the practical life and develop their communication skills, self-learning, and ability to use critical thinking to face science and modern technologies (Al Abri, 2008). It is clear that students need to develop their communication skills. English communication also included into this field of skills, thus, students need to be supported to gain this ability. This journal state that student in Oman often get less opportunity to speak English out of class, also course book is only place where they can learn English (Al  Zedjali, 2009). Although speaking is considered a main language skill that students should improve, it has been widely noticed that they face many difficulties in speaking English. This study aims to find out what speaking difficulties are encountered by grade 5 students in basic education schools in Oman. It also aims to find out the main factors that contribute to the existence of these difficulties.The results of this study can help the Ministry of Education, the EFL teachers, the curriculum designers, and the designers of assessment tools to understand the reasons why our young learners in grade 5 basic education schools find it difficult to speak in English, and consequently, their plans for change and improvement of the students’ speaking skill can produce more effective results when these factors are considered.


Thankyou for visiting my blog. See you to the next post 😉

Sunday, 21 April 2019

Journal Comparison

Hi, there! How are you? Here we meet again on my blog, with a new topic. Today I'm going to compare two journals related to speaking skills. Sounds interesting right? And for pre-face introduction I would like to share to you what am I going to compare between two journals. As we know my last journal to review is titled The iPad as Mediating Tool to Support EFL Speaking Skills, and the second journal will be Speaking Difficulties Encountered by Young Language Learners, a study by Samira Al-Hosni. Furthermore I will compare in the aspect of the content and structure. So here we go !

The firs one to compare is their Introduction
First Journal, this journal delivers the scrutiny of the iPad as bridge tool as used by the learners and the teachers by way of the learners-iPad-teacher interplay (mediation) and point of result on the sustain of the iPad for speaking skills. The aim of this research is to contribute to the body of research
inside MALL concerning the mediation value of secondary EFL learners' speaking skills development, which is below-researched. It particularly sees at what behavioral changes happen in learners and teachers as a outcome of the iPad as a tool. In particular, this journal investigate the following research question: How does speaking skills supported by mediating tool which is iPad.
The second journal, Obviously, it is necessary to develop communication skills. English oral communication skills are part of this skill set, and thus, students should be supported to gain these skills. Learners of English in Oman often do not have opportunities to speak English outside the classroom, and for many of them, the course book is the only place where they meet English (Al Zedjali, 2009). Although speaking is considered a main language skill that students should improve, it has been widely noticed that they face many difficulties in speaking English. This study aims to find out what speaking difficulties are encountered by grade 5 students in basic education schools in Oman. It also aims to find out the main factors that contribute to the existence of these difficulties.The results of this study can help the Ministry of Education, the EFL teachers, the curriculum designers, and the designers of assessment tools to understand the reasons why our young learners in grade 5 basic education schools find it difficult to speak in English, and consequently, their plans for change and improvement of the students’ speaking skill can produce more effective results when these factors are considered.

The second aspect to compared is their goals
The first journal is aimed to investigate effective language learning pedagogy to use mobile devices is classroom settings to develop foreign language skills specifically by performing speaking tasks as reported in Pegrum (2014) and Lys (2013).
The second journal is aimed to answer the following questions, first question is what are speaking difficulties faced by grade 5 students? And the second question is what are factors that influenced to the existence of those difficulties? 

The third aspect is comparing the Method
The first journal, The research followed an action research approach. In classroom action research, concrete and practical issues of immediate concern to teachers and learners are considered by the researcher. It is conducted during regular lessons, particularly qualitative research used common methods such as observations (Burns, 1999). Action research is often considered as a spiralling process of reflection and investigation.Refer to Kemmis and McTaggart (1988), there are four comprehensive steps in a cycle: planning, action, observation and reflection that normally involved in action research. This research followed mainly an action research cycle due to the collaborative and reflective nature of the project itself, even though the researcher was not teaching the students involved in the research (Burns, 2003). One who always considered as of the participants in the cycle was researcher. This research conducted to private middle school in Italia which publicly subsidized and recently took a policy to have a research about iPad for their two classes. In this research, 43 students took a part in the General English Class as a part of Italian.

Requirement of Education Ministry and two teachers. Every student had been given an iPad since 2014 for their research in and out of the class. Classroom observation notes from three lessons, student and teacher interviews (N:18), lesson plans on speaking tasks (N:3), comments on speaking focused lessons  from teachers’ meetings (3 meetings in total), and survey responses (N:41), those are the data collected. Those data is checked to interrogate the use iPad by teachers and students due to speaking activity performance for six months

          The researcher observed the earlier involvement of students with iPad as mediator for studying English in the first phase of research. When they get ability to study simple English task (listen for recording, play it, etc.), observe the use of iPad as mediator to improve EFL skills and to do many things with that language these mean the students had been mastered it. In particular, differential in using iPad, strategy that teachers use and the responsive of students toward mediation in order to speak such as collaboration and self-evaluation is measured. As the result, triangulation with survey data and interview in the earlier research, to compare the perception and students’ habit and teachers toward technology tools.

The second journal, this study involved five teachers and students of grade 5. The instruments used in this study were lesson observation, interview and curriculum analysis. Lesson observation was conducted in the class to reveal the speaking difficulties faced by students. Four semi-structured interviews were conducted toward students and teachers of grade 5 to find their perspectives about the factors that caused those speaking difficulties. The last instrument analyzed the curriculum on the grade 5 textbook (English for Me) based on the two issues. The issues are what speaking activity the textbook contained are and what type of those activity is.

Thankyou for visiting

Monday, 1 April 2019

Review Journal "The iPad as Mediating Tool to Support EFL Speaking Skills" (Findings Section)



Good to see you again to another post, buddies! In this post I would like to continue reviewing and paraphrasing the Findings Section. Finding section is where you report the findings of your study based upon the methodology [or methodologies] you applied to gather information. It should state the findings of the research arranged in a logical sequence without bias or interpretation. Let's have a look to this journal's findings section.


FINDINGS

The role of the iPad in mediating speaking tasks
            How iPad has been used as meadiating tool between student and L2 is analyzed in this research. In particular, the data shows 1) Students can revise and correct their speaking performance in the iPad storage, and teachers take the tasks and reflected it. Student can develop their autonomy to become larger in doing tasks and improve their competency by repeat their language task as much as they want. The evidence of this research provided in the example that taken from learning observation and interview data. The lack of interest in question practice during EFL caused a student faced some problems in the correct use of questing intonation. He gradually involved in the learning task when he used iPad, it possibly make him to work by his own speed based on his weakness. He became very motivated and finish all his recording, he also listened to the recording he gave to his teacher who gave personal feedback.


“…I didn’t really like repeating questions and intonation, also the teacher was asking me to do
it every lesson. When I started using the iPad, I thought it was a useful exercise. The thing is that
no one can listen to me, so I do the activity and I don’t care what the others think…I feel my
pronunciation has improved a lot”.
(G. student – interview data)

2) This dynamic created collaborative habit where the teachers and students worked together to develop L2 learning base on what has been observed. Evidence of self-reflective and involve collaboration during language task showed by many researches (Lys, 2013; Pellerin, 2014). Self-reflection supported by the use cellular device that possibly to “digital documentation or learning evidence that real and vivid” confirmed by this study (Pellerin 2012a, page. 14). This research gave example the use of iPad to record and listen individual performance as the proof of learning consciousness and students’ self control. By using the function of recording, they can listen, recognize, and change some aspect (e.g. some pronunciations, connecting device to improve fluency, etc.), students talk several time about this. Experience always considered to be their performance reflection as positive practice.

Features of mediation in MALL
            Two different features from tablets mediation in the class have been possibly identificated: they were supporting interaction and facilitate scaffolding. 1)  They possibly can make way to interact speaking based on tasks, one to one or to many, modifiable, and learning oriented. It supported the idea that interaction which based on tasks and mediated computer can be ‘cognitive reinforcement’, which means it gives a new dimension and stimulate learning. iPad especially used to build asynchrony interaction with teacher by students who involved in this research. For example, through the use of specific app like Evernote they can ask and got personalized feedback. The tools was mediating this interaction by giving them a chance to fasten the process of making a good speaking performance. In general, based on techers feedback, students could do speaking tasks with high quality and fast even though it is absolutely that times and amount of mediation needed by each students are different. The tools offer fast working in revision, for example, it impacted to students’ pronunciation.

2) The importance of sfaffolding functions is provided and supported by tablet. Through scaffolding that made in the interaction with medium students might be done out of Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). According to Vygotsky “the distance between the actual development level as determined by independent problem solving, and the level of potential development as determined through problem solving under adult guidance or in collaboration with more capable peers” (Vygotsky; 1978, p.86). As a proof for this statement, researcher could see students repeated their recording more than once when class observation was being held. To support their performance, recording is often used as scaffolding technique. Students explained this habit as positive aspect to improve their accuracy.

            Access to many authentic language sample is owned by students; some method is used by tool to mediate their understandings about content and task instruction. First, it is possible to listen to sample as much as they want according to their proficiency in L2, it is in line with what they told. Motivator, Scaffolder and task simplifier are the functions of iPad in this case. Considering  the quality of their performance irrespectively  in foreign language, finally students could finish the tasks by the time provided. This is in line which Lantolf and Thorne (2006) stated, in reality, the frequency and quality of help and mediation needed in new language can be varied depend on sort period of time even though the performance itself doesn’t change significantly from a lesson to another lesson (Aljaafreh & Lantolf, 1994). Students who involved in this research for example, need moments to response positively the lesson mediator from a new tool, it is maybe because the used to know that teacher is only mediator in language class. Therefore, as Lantolf and Thorne (2006, p.208)  supported in the name of development, “while nothing has ostensibly changed in the learner’s actual performance, development has taken place because the quality of mediation needed to prompt the performance has changed.”  As proof from this statement, example, it is actually didn’t necessary for the last lesson, some of scaffolding activities needed in the earlier project, such as following the instructions from pdf file or listening to recording in order to find the key of information. If it is not  has  meaning as a good cognitive dimension  for students the symbols wouldn’t be valuable. Availability of cellular devices are not only known by students as physical tools. This fact also in this research and supporting other research (Pellerin, 2014). Students know how to operate and the keys of media and how to implement it in the daily life. iPad can be tool to learn about second language is unrecognizable by students in the earlier research. Guidance from their teachers is needed in order to take them to the level of recognition. Students are recognized the use of iPad has been impacted their speaking performance after they started to did particular speaking tasks. The move of this perspective doesn’t need to be clarified by teachers explicitly. Furthermore, the difference of the expectations of the students involved  toward realty make it harder. In reality, most of students didn’t believe that iPad can help them with their speaking skills improvement as this research concluded.

That is my paraphrase, thank you for your visit and see you to another post.